With the support of
the Canton of Geneva
and the City of Geneva

Ville de Genève
Loterie Romande

Training for journalists

Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie
Panic on the eve of human rights review
HRT
The United nations office at Geneva Photo: Fred Burnand
7 April 08 - Sixteen countries are getting ready on Monday for the universal periodic review (UPR). They are concerned about the teething troubles plaguing the new mechanism. At the top of the list is Bahrain that is coming with a 27 strong delegation.

Carole Vann/ Human Rights Tribune - For the first time in the history of the UN, member states are each going to be examined in turn on their human rights records. The inaugural session of UPR, the big new thing at the Human Rights Council, opens on Monday.

For two weeks, 16 delegations – Bahrain, Ecuador, Tunisia, Morocco, Indonesia, Finland, United Kingdom, India, Brazil, Philippines, Algeria, Poland, Netherlands, South Africa, the Czech Republic and Argentina – are going to be scrutinised by the 47 member Council. A troika made up of diplomats of three countries drawn by lots is responsible for making each review easier and for writing a report on the human rights record of the country under examination.

But in the last few days panic has swept through the UN. Although this new exercise is supposed to make up for the deficiencies of the former Human Rights Commission by putting everybody on an equal footing, there is total confusion on the steps to be followed.

On Friday, the president of the Human Rights Council, Doru Costea, was presented with a letter signed by African and Arab countries and those belonging to the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, asking that each stage of the procedure is fixed in advance and that the sessions –although public – are not filmed.

An emergency meeting was held. It is important to remember that the filmed sessions are an important tool for small countries that do not have the money to send diplomats to the Council. As for the procedure, Doru Costea, explained that it was impossible to foresee everything in advance and that it would take one to two years for this new review to find its footing.

But several NGOs believe that this stormy debate is a new attempt by some countries, in fact the same countries as those who want to get rid of the special rapporteurs in order to weaken anything that resembles a review of their own human rights record.

The first countries to test out this new exercise are the most concerned. First off is Bahrain whose 27 strong delegation will include several government Ministers. Human rights activists and government opposition have also come to Geneva in force to condemn the human rights abuses in their country.

But representatives of 7 NGOs from Bahrein, under the umbrella of the International Federation of Human Rights, were in for a nasty surprise when they asked on Friday to meet troika members – Slovenia, Great Britain and Sri Lanka – who are tasked with evaluating their country.

“We had a shock when the president of the Council, M. Costea, told us that we had to get permission from our government” explained Nabil Rabjab, vice president of the Centre for Human Rights in Bahrain. “A country like ours is never going to agree to that!”. Even it they were able to hand over their report, the Bahraini human rights activists were not able to meet the three countries responsible for assessing their government. They learnt however that “fake NGOs” approved by the Bahraini delegation would meet the troika on Monday just before the review.

Doru Costea doesn’t stop NGOS from meeting delegations

Concerning the article "Uncertainty before the big country test" which appeared on the 7th April on the Human Rights Tribune and in Le Temps, the president of the Human Rights Council, Doru Costa, would like to clarify that he never told human rights activists from Bahrain that they had to have the permission of their government in order to be able to meet the delegations from the troika that are assessing their country.

This correction from M. Costea is in response to the statement by Nabil Rajab, vice president of the Centre for human rights in Bahrain, who said at the end of the article: "We were shocked when the president of the Council, M Costea, told us that we had to get the authorisation of our government" In any case the Bahraini human rights defenders were not able to meet with the troika before the assessment. Was it then the Bahraini government or the troika delegations that vetoed this?

Carole Vann

 

Comment

Forum registration required

Prior to reacting to this article, you must register. Thank you for entering the personal identifier supplied to you. If you are not already registered, you must register.

Personal identifiers


[register] [password forgotten?]

 
More articles about same themes ? Use advanced search
-------- --------

A call to end patriarchal Islam 14.05

Multinationals at the first Human Rights Tribune Encounter 13.05

China/Olympic Games: Companies should act accordingly to the Olympic values 6.05

Ziegler’s hard hitting successor at the UN 6.05

Connecting human rights to the environment 25.04

--------

Swiss in human rights hot seat 9.05

Switzerland under UN scrutiny 8.05

Myanmar: First visas issued to relief teams 8.05

Ziegler’s hard hitting successor at the UN 6.05

Connecting human rights to the environment 25.04

--------

Mexican farms employ kids illegally, U.N. says 15.05
Read the article

Sri Lanka: National Action Plan on Human Rights 14.05
Read the article

Human Rights Act has ’helped rapists and murderers escape justice’ for 10 years, says top detective 14.05
Read the article

Rights Groups Concerned About Sudan Arrests 14.05
Read the article

Human rights improvements on the Swiss cards 13.05

Ghana: Country Halts Military Protection for Mining Companies 13.05
Read the article

--------

Murder of Guatemalan journalist 15.05

Electoral reform in Lebanon begins with respect for human rights 13.05

--------

Child Soldiering Driven by "Unequal Power Equation" 14.05

Russia vacillating over abolition of death penalty 2.05

About us  |  www.humanrights-geneva.info  |  Editorial teams
designed by vocables.com with Spip
infosud swissinfo le temps ipsnews sommairerue 89 prix nicolas bouvier